Features Can India replace petcoke with coal? 14 December, 2020 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Share Tweet Post Email LATEST Environment Heidelberg Materials launch CO2 capture trial at Ketton Cutting-edge technology tested at Ketton cement May 09, 2024 People Ecocem names new Managing Director for UK and Ireland Leadership transition marks a milestone in the May 09, 2024 MOST READ Environment Prometheus Materials produces cement with algae Startup innovates zero-carbon May 06, 2024 Markets & Competition FLSmidth Cement signs service pact with TITAN Group Expanding service agreement enhances cement industry May 02, 2024 Can India replace petcoke with coal? India is mulling whether or not it will ban the use of petroleum coke as a fuel on a national level, leaving the industries reliant on it to search for other viable options. However, logistic constraints for domestic coal and rising prices for foreigner-sourced coal could prove a challenge to Indian cement players. A supply problem India's ramping energy demand comes from many sources, with the main ones being the government's increasing effort to reach higher rates of electrification in rural areas of the country, and growing industry demand for fuel across several manufacturing sectors. Even as both state and private bodies ramp up extraction of coal for distribution and use across the country, the supply has been insufficient to meet the growth of several energy-intensive industries, among them cement. Therefore, firms have been relying on alternate fuel sources other than domestic coal suppliers, having first turned to international coal, and later to petcoke once coal prices started to rally and the government imposed an INR 400 per ton duty on coal imports. Petcoke first proved a reliable fuel input as cement companies could use it in their kilns in the manufacturing process without having to execute many changes in their equipment. Its use in energy production also proved effective for similar reasons, with the cost-benefit value heightened as its initial value, when compared to coal, was very cheap, and it possesses a higher calorific value. Being a bottom-of-the-barrel leftover from the production of diesel, most companies that produce it tend to dispense of it as cheaply as possible, and the increase in prices proved a boon for refiners. Read the full article in ICCM 42 Sign in Don't have any account? Create one SHOW Forgot your username/ password? Log in Terms Of Service Privacy Policy This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and Terms of Service apply Sign in as: User Registration * Required field Sign In Information Personal Information Agree Yes No Terms of Service:You consent that we will collect the information you have provided us herein as well as subsequent use of our platform to render and personalize our services, send you newsletters and occasionally provide you with other information. * Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required. Register SaveCookies user preferencesWe use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.Accept allDecline allCW GroupNewsAcceptDecline